Miley Cyrus + sheets = child porn?


From Journal of Media Arts Culture.


From Cosmopolitans article “The Sexiest Things to Do After Sex


From the article “Do Tell: What Do You Think Is the Best Thing To Do After Sex?


From the article “Sex and muscles – How is sex affecting my muscle size and overall training?


I think you get the point.

So, the question is: Is wrapping a 15 year old girl from Disney’s show Hannah Montana with bed sheet suggestive of sex considered a form of child pornography? Even if its done tastefully(?) and without explicit nudity. The other big questions is, what were the Disney people thinking, why are they not able to protect one of their most valuable product? Their share should be talking a dive. Read about this story on New York Times.

10 Responses to “Miley Cyrus + sheets = child porn?”


  1. 1 Ripped Corner April 29, 2008 at 7:35 am

    Please, upload the image to your own server.

    Thanks

  2. 2 custador April 29, 2008 at 11:34 am

    Frankly, anybody who thinks that picture is anything resembling child porn is either seriously warped or a paranoid reactionary paedophile who’s trying to cover their own guilt by accusing random others of paedophilia.

    No, it’s not child porn or any other kind of porn. It’s a 15 year old girl wrapped in a sheet and looking like she just woke up and got out of bed. Big deal.

  3. 3 Neo*utO April 30, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    > custador

    I am not arbitrarily accusing it of child porn,
    But i think there is a legitimate debate on whether it is no not.

    and, yes

    News of child trafficking for prostitution purpose and abused child that are so often aired in our society making it irresistible for me to see her as portraying a victim.

    am i feeling guilty? yes i am

    i am feel really guilty that our advanced society have often fail to protect our weakest member, our future our children.

    she simply reminds me of all the abused children in the world that need help.

  4. 4 ana May 4, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    miley your setting a bad example

  5. 5 custador May 6, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    If you’re using the above photographs to justify your argument, I would think that you would take into account other factors:

    Frontal nudity.
    Presence of other people.
    Showing of pubic hair.
    Lustful facial expression.

    The Miley Cyrus picture (unlike the ones above)fails all of those tests. To any normally adjusted person, it simply is NOT sexually suggestive.

  6. 6 Neo*utO May 6, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    I guess i am more sensitive to sub context than most people

  7. 7 halee nash May 11, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    shut the fuck up.
    miley cyrus is not a whore.
    its NOT pornography.
    its art.
    you stupid fucking bitch.

  8. 8 wow.... December 15, 2008 at 7:02 am

    thats messed up man…… god i cant beleave it she would just go off and di this?? woow all the kids parents are going to be pissed but i guss you said its art….. but still i dont know no more about sex i guss…….
    :(


  1. 1 I Suspect Daddy : Porch Dog Trackback on April 29, 2008 at 5:22 pm
  2. 2 I Suspect Daddy « Porch Dog Trackback on April 29, 2008 at 5:28 pm

Leave a Reply




Readings

Stats

  • 29,995 hits